What about multilingual
Nov 26, 2023 9:25:47 GMT
Post by account_disabled on Nov 26, 2023 9:25:47 GMT
the prior page. @hoosier: 301s from your old URLs to your new combined content page sounds like the preferred method for your situation. 301 redirects are still of primary importance. rel=”canonical” should only be used in areas where the content is identical (or very similar) but it’s not possible to eliminate content from being served on multiple URLs. Yannick said… What if there is no link to the canonical page in the site itself? In your example, say the swedish-fish is always presented in a category context, i.e. there is no link in Asia Mobile Number List
the site directly to www.example.co
m/product.php?item=swedish-fish — however this URL does render properly. Is it still ok to use it as a canonical, even if no link point to it? @yannick: Yes, rel=”canonical” can still take effect, even if there are no other links to the preferred version of the URL. Cahit said… The same real content but a little different design, like “results in LIST type”, “results in CATALOG type”; “view large icons” “view list” Content is infact the same but we show it different. Should “canonical” be used in this case? @cahit: Yes, if the items in your content page are the same but with different views,
such as sort order or listing type, then rel=”canonical” can be used. Olagato said… sites… mydomain.com/es/ mydomain.com/fr/ …the same structure with different language content. This is made with an authomatic redirection from “root domain”: mydomain.com/ to “language domain” by example mydomain.com/en/ (through navigator language) …A canonical tag to: mydomain.com/ is needed ? @olagato: Each language should have a separate URL because the content is unique. We’d advise against equating different languages using either 301s or link.
the site directly to www.example.co
m/product.php?item=swedish-fish — however this URL does render properly. Is it still ok to use it as a canonical, even if no link point to it? @yannick: Yes, rel=”canonical” can still take effect, even if there are no other links to the preferred version of the URL. Cahit said… The same real content but a little different design, like “results in LIST type”, “results in CATALOG type”; “view large icons” “view list” Content is infact the same but we show it different. Should “canonical” be used in this case? @cahit: Yes, if the items in your content page are the same but with different views,
such as sort order or listing type, then rel=”canonical” can be used. Olagato said… sites… mydomain.com/es/ mydomain.com/fr/ …the same structure with different language content. This is made with an authomatic redirection from “root domain”: mydomain.com/ to “language domain” by example mydomain.com/en/ (through navigator language) …A canonical tag to: mydomain.com/ is needed ? @olagato: Each language should have a separate URL because the content is unique. We’d advise against equating different languages using either 301s or link.